Var =
The domino effect of falling dictators Tunisian, Libyan and Egyptian sounds like a wind direction of democracy in Arab countries. Hope is reborn among the people under the dictatorship but it is highly probable that this hope will be sterile. In fact, Arab countries do not seem ready for democracy because the change was abrupt and two reasons to oppose this development.
The first cause is related to the religion that surrounds the gearbox in a straitjacket. Islam is not a narrative interspersed with legends like the Bible but the word of Allah own
, reported by the archangel Djibril Mohammed. Yet God's word can not be challenged by humans and it requires that the Koran
remains frozen in its original version.
While the Torah is based on the spiritual and the rule of man, Islam imposes rites for the acts of daily life are orchestrated so as immutable with a willingness to take precedence on human reasoning. Followers must then complete obedience by making religion in total contradiction with the essence of democracy. Alexis de Tocqueville
, the theorist of Western democracy, defending individual freedom and political equality. But the major threat to the Arab countries lies in the renunciation of freedom, advocated by supporters of Islamism. The principle of equality required by democracy is fought by the Sharia
who insists on inequality among human beings. The concept of slavery is also justified in the Qur'an: "Abolishing slavery fell almost to the inconceivable. Forbid what God permits is a crime almost as great as to permit what He forbids. "
Until the Arab countries have locked their borders to avoid being contaminated by the traditions of Western societies to avoid the overlap between the populations in Muslim lands. Modern history shows that no Muslim country is not entered or remained in democracy as long as all attempts were doomed to failure.
The example of Turkey is complimentary and demonstrates that the experience has been that long. Came to power through free elections, the Islamists of the AKP have gradually eliminated those who could overshadow them. The generals were sent into retirement and the most recalcitrant had to answer for their rebellion in the courts. The modern Constitution was amended in the silence of the opposition to reduce the power of the military, which guaranteed secularism. These episodes show that there is only one Islam and that those who believe in the existence of an Islamic "light" , said moderate, are wrong. Access to power of Islamists is often realized by a loss of democracy because, based on their religious tenets, they confiscate freedoms to the detriment of the interests of their people.
The influence of the Umma
Muslim citizens do not control their future because it depends on the will of Allah that imposes its guidance to the Ummah
The community of believers, by imposing a influence of religion on all aspects of society and sometimes verging on the totalitarian doctrine. The Arab countries can not be reconciled with democracy if Islam is separated from the state since Sharia denies man the right to legislate, and only God's law supersedes all secular laws.
Arab dictators misusing these concepts to fight any attempt to break the shackles of a totalitarian theocracy using to oppose democracy. So, to motivate people broken under the yoke of a tyrant, they are the plaything of
jihad, war holy, in a sort of outlet for diverting their attention on the realities of modern society. In the ongoing battle, the militants who train for jihad have more time to focus on their plight and demands of the modern world too committed to defending human rights.
Nature regimes
The second obstacle to democracy is the nature of political regimes in place. Outside the feudal monarchies, Arab countries have simply copied the European dictatorships of the twentieth century by exploiting the same ingredients: a leader dubbed by the people, a single party to silence opposition, an army under the command of Chief of the Secret Service omnipotent and omnipresent, nationalism that advocates the rule of the Arab identity over all other ethnic groups, a nationalized and centralized economy, and finally the brake on progress to stifle any desire for emancipation. addition, Arab societies are formed into clans that allow dictatorships to rely on tribal ties, while the promotions of military schools cement their power. These clans are substituted for the formation of political parties by repressing by force and terror, any attempt to impose democracy.
Americans are not immune from liability because they have always imposed their double game by words, they encourage democracy and support the opposition movements abroad while protecting the authoritarian regimes in the interest of the United States. In fact, the owners desire to dominate oil into the hands of democracies who was careful to change all that. The genius of dictatorships to invent a machine for acquiring income for personal gain causes them to neglect refugee populations into submission and resignation.
This financial strength, coupled with a demographic power, could realize ambitious projects in technology, in social development in the general welfare, in the acquisition of European monopolies and control over the mighty West. In fact the opposite has been achieved. Revenues are donated to a minority that monopolizes and stores them in the coffers of Western banks for purely personal, if not villainous. Furthermore, to consolidate their power is not shared, the despots squandered much of the oil revenues in buying weapons to protect their privileges by force.
Westerners needed dictators s 'opposed to the democratic awakening, which guaranteed their oil supplies at competitive costs while safeguarding the economic interests and fighting terrorists like the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. But this double game played against the learning democracy while terrorist acts were increasing as a result of the oppression of dictators against their people.
It is not clear that dictatorships Tunisian, Egyptian and Libyan be replaced by democracies in the meaning of the West. Besides Nasser was replaced by Mubarak Ben Ali and Bourguiba by. The force succeeds force. Dictatorial regimes generate their own antibodies while democracy desired by the Arab peoples may be diluted in an Islamic power that will moderate the name. Arab countries must bring themselves to treat their hereditary curse which is called a dictatorship if they want to reconcile with democracy.
, reported by the archangel Djibril Mohammed. Yet God's word can not be challenged by humans and it requires that the Koran
remains frozen in its original version.
While the Torah is based on the spiritual and the rule of man, Islam imposes rites for the acts of daily life are orchestrated so as immutable with a willingness to take precedence on human reasoning. Followers must then complete obedience by making religion in total contradiction with the essence of democracy. Alexis de Tocqueville
, the theorist of Western democracy, defending individual freedom and political equality. But the major threat to the Arab countries lies in the renunciation of freedom, advocated by supporters of Islamism. The principle of equality required by democracy is fought by the Sharia
who insists on inequality among human beings. The concept of slavery is also justified in the Qur'an: "Abolishing slavery fell almost to the inconceivable. Forbid what God permits is a crime almost as great as to permit what He forbids. "
Until the Arab countries have locked their borders to avoid being contaminated by the traditions of Western societies to avoid the overlap between the populations in Muslim lands. Modern history shows that no Muslim country is not entered or remained in democracy as long as all attempts were doomed to failure.
The example of Turkey is complimentary and demonstrates that the experience has been that long. Came to power through free elections, the Islamists of the AKP have gradually eliminated those who could overshadow them. The generals were sent into retirement and the most recalcitrant had to answer for their rebellion in the courts. The modern Constitution was amended in the silence of the opposition to reduce the power of the military, which guaranteed secularism. These episodes show that there is only one Islam and that those who believe in the existence of an Islamic "light" , said moderate, are wrong. Access to power of Islamists is often realized by a loss of democracy because, based on their religious tenets, they confiscate freedoms to the detriment of the interests of their people.
The influence of the Umma
Muslim citizens do not control their future because it depends on the will of Allah that imposes its guidance to the Ummah
The community of believers, by imposing a influence of religion on all aspects of society and sometimes verging on the totalitarian doctrine. The Arab countries can not be reconciled with democracy if Islam is separated from the state since Sharia denies man the right to legislate, and only God's law supersedes all secular laws.
Arab dictators misusing these concepts to fight any attempt to break the shackles of a totalitarian theocracy using to oppose democracy. So, to motivate people broken under the yoke of a tyrant, they are the plaything of
jihad, war holy, in a sort of outlet for diverting their attention on the realities of modern society. In the ongoing battle, the militants who train for jihad have more time to focus on their plight and demands of the modern world too committed to defending human rights.
Nature regimes
The second obstacle to democracy is the nature of political regimes in place. Outside the feudal monarchies, Arab countries have simply copied the European dictatorships of the twentieth century by exploiting the same ingredients: a leader dubbed by the people, a single party to silence opposition, an army under the command of Chief of the Secret Service omnipotent and omnipresent, nationalism that advocates the rule of the Arab identity over all other ethnic groups, a nationalized and centralized economy, and finally the brake on progress to stifle any desire for emancipation. addition, Arab societies are formed into clans that allow dictatorships to rely on tribal ties, while the promotions of military schools cement their power. These clans are substituted for the formation of political parties by repressing by force and terror, any attempt to impose democracy.
Americans are not immune from liability because they have always imposed their double game by words, they encourage democracy and support the opposition movements abroad while protecting the authoritarian regimes in the interest of the United States. In fact, the owners desire to dominate oil into the hands of democracies who was careful to change all that. The genius of dictatorships to invent a machine for acquiring income for personal gain causes them to neglect refugee populations into submission and resignation.
This financial strength, coupled with a demographic power, could realize ambitious projects in technology, in social development in the general welfare, in the acquisition of European monopolies and control over the mighty West. In fact the opposite has been achieved. Revenues are donated to a minority that monopolizes and stores them in the coffers of Western banks for purely personal, if not villainous. Furthermore, to consolidate their power is not shared, the despots squandered much of the oil revenues in buying weapons to protect their privileges by force.
Westerners needed dictators s 'opposed to the democratic awakening, which guaranteed their oil supplies at competitive costs while safeguarding the economic interests and fighting terrorists like the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. But this double game played against the learning democracy while terrorist acts were increasing as a result of the oppression of dictators against their people.
It is not clear that dictatorships Tunisian, Egyptian and Libyan be replaced by democracies in the meaning of the West. Besides Nasser was replaced by Mubarak Ben Ali and Bourguiba by. The force succeeds force. Dictatorial regimes generate their own antibodies while democracy desired by the Arab peoples may be diluted in an Islamic power that will moderate the name. Arab countries must bring themselves to treat their hereditary curse which is called a dictatorship if they want to reconcile with democracy.